About Me

Name: Cal Samuel August
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

To Carry on Is Noble: Facing Up to the Terrible Event at Virginia Tech

For any talk of two Americas or more (John Edwards style) when times were less grave, in times like these when push comes to shove the people of the United States come together. It becomes a time of reflection, a time to put down the less serious everyday tasks. On 9/11 I'm sure for many days there was that terrible sickening feeling in the stomach among many people. I know I felt that way. Though the Virginia Tech event was not of the magnitude of the events of September 11 we certainly do feel a measure of the sadness that we did on that terrible September day a few years back. In times like these, for a certain time, we drop what we are doing and stand at attention.

When I heard of the terrible massacre on Monday, I truly did a double take. It was not two people, but thirty- two people who were murdered on Monday. These things will surely happen, whether by the course of a natural catastrophe or brought about by people carrying out acts of evil in the world. We could board up every room, lock every door, put up line after line of security, but when someone is determined to carry out a random terrible deed, they may not always be thwarted. Such was the case on Monday.

It is the randomness, the unexpected quickness, the not being able to say goodbye that makes things like these so difficult. It brought to mind when I was at seminary, and my mother called to tell me that my uncle had passed away as a result of a terrible traffic accident. When the funeral was all said and done, it was time to go and tell my almost-ninety year old grandmother, who had been in a nursing home for several years as the result of a debilitating cerebral hemorrhage. I wasn't sure how she would take it, but as the matriarch of our family, a woman not unaccustomed to her own measure of suffering, my mother told her and asked her if she understood. She did not shed tears, but simply nodded her head in knowing. She carried on.

In times like these, we must all face the noble task of carrying on. Many will be tempted to talk gun control and security, to pass the blame to various administrations at various levels, but a better way is simply to keep our eyes open, stand tall and strong in the face of evil, to carry on and live our lives to the fullest, in freedom and full defiance of anyone who would intend us harm. This is a noble thing. In Matthew 10:16 Jesus Christ tells His hearers that He sends them out as sheep in the midst of wolves, He exhorts them to be as crafty as serpents and as innocent as doves. This exhortation is to all who must look evil in the face.

Now for those who mourn and remain for a time in sadness, there is comfort in the Scriptures.
Many passages come to mind, but I will share only a few.

I think of King David who mourned his dying infant son. His servants mentioned the fact that he fasted and wept while the child was alive, but once the child had died, David got up to eat bread. This puzzled them. David responded simply that he did so while the child was living, hoping that God might be gracious and spare the child, but in the time of death there was nothing more for him to do. He said simply, "I shall go to him, but he will not return to me."
(see 2 Samuel Chapter 12).

Truly this is the case for all of us. Those who have passed cannot come to us, but we have the promise that we will go to them. Consider what Job said in his own day (Chapter 19) knowing that His redeemer lived, and that even after worms destroyed his skin, he believed truly that at the last he would stand on the earth, in the flesh, face to face with that redeemer.

And that redeemer is Christ, about whom the Apostle Paul said in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-14 (King James version):

But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
For those who believe in Christ, there is hope. We shall one day be again with those who have died in Christ. This is most certainly true.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Virginia Tech. -Cal Samuel August
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is it still the Economy Stupid?

What's the main issue now, and who seems to be the strongest candidate thus far? 
"It's the economy stupid" may have been a catchphrase coined by James Carville and used by the Clinton machine to win the 1992 election, but is it the full equation today?  No.  A good economy depends on stability and security; in the post 9/11 world we can see how concerns about those issues can really weigh heavily and drag down the most robust of economies.  However, the American economy is amazingly resilient as time as shown, and the will of the American people will always be make a comeback even in the worst of times. 

As for all the candidates, Rudy seems to be the strongest thus far (I know Hugh Hewitt seems to like Mitt Romney, but I think Rudy is still stronger).  Rudy has "it" on the economy front and so far on the security front, though I'd like to know what his policies with the overwhelming illegal-alien situation will be.  If he's any bit as tough as he was governing New York, I think he would find the right balance.  For his economic views see his Townhall posted article.  I think you'll like them: 

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RudyGiuliani/2007/04/11/my_four_pillars_of_american_prosperity

Even in '92 "It's the economy stupid" was a bit simplistic, and of course, a bit insulting too.  In the 2008 election "security" and "economy" will be the major issues.  Moral issues will be important too.  In the post-Clinton era, let alone post 9/11 I think many Americans are tired of Oval Office bad personal behavior and want a president who will focus on the job at hand, above all.  That's why some Americans are questioning Rudy's past social behavior as he presently runs for office.  They don't want more Clintonesque shenanigans.  But Rudy isn't the only one who has personal morality issues to deal with (especially when we consider how long it took O'Bama to take the law seriously and pay off his parking tickets and the-what many perceive as-the shady past of Mrs. Clinton.)  If Rudy was able to handle the overregulation and prune down the strangulating New York City bureaucracy, I think he will be willing to prune Washington bureaucracy as much as possible back to health.  In the meantime, economics and security are still his strongest issues.  If he wants to keep conservative support he MUST hold to putting forward strict constructionists justices should he get Supreme Court appointments, and of course, keep his head on straight morally.  -Cal Samuel August

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Dictionary of Forbidden Words

No, this is not an article about words banned by the FCC from use on public airwaves.  Here's the deal.  One of these days we're going to have to have two dictionaries: the one with sanctioned words and the underground supplemental with all the words that are no longer allowed to be used because of political- correctness. 

Every time someone brings up a concern about something serious that liberals don't like, there seems to be a scramble for new words to reinterpret the situation, to euphemize, sanitize, and redefine the language surrounding the otherwise hairy expression.  Here are a few words and phrases that seem to be banned these days: 

banned word: terrorist (see American, patriot)     sanctioned word: insurgent, freedom-fighter. 

When terrorism seriously reared its head on 9/11 the mainstream media quickly found words to sanitize what terrorist thugs really are.  People who prey on innocent people by using bombs among crowds, anthrax sent to congress-to Democrats or Republicans-are simply terrorists. 

banned words: American, patriot    sanctioned word: terrorist, oppressor

Just when you thought "terrorist" was a banned word, it has just been reapplied.  To liberals it seems that Americans are the terrorists and oppressors forcing our will on the world.  That is why we have to sign on to treaties and conventions that weaken our country and prevent us from acting when we are seriously threatened (or go to the UN). 

banned phrase: war on terror    sanctioned phrase: law enforcement issue

Increasingly, many liberals are trying to rephrase and redirect language to make the problem not sound as serious.  Many confused people are saying, "We can't really have a war on terror."  "Terrorism in Iraq is not really the issue."  "We should be fighting in Afghanistan (if at all)."  The joke about calling terrorism a "law enforcement issue" is that many liberals don't really want to enforce any laws concerning terrorism; they wouldn't want to infringe on anyone's "civil liberties."  

banned words: crime, obscenity        sanctioned words: expression, civil liberties, rights

When it comes to crime that should be punished with jail time, we can't actually punish criminals because it would be a violation of their civil liberties.  When it comes to disapproving of obscenity or inappropriate television material that kids could see and try to emulate, it has to be allowed because the makers of that material are just "expressing themselves."   

banned words: illegal alien        sanctioned words: undocumented worker

Since breaking the law doesn't mean anything, "illegal aliens" must be redefined as "undocumented workers."  They're just these random people floating around in society doing jobs Americans don't want to do and costing our society billions of dollars in taxpayer money.  They don't mean any harm. 

banned word: evil        sanctioned word: ?

Call evil whatever you want.  In the liberal world, there's no such thing as evil.  Well, unless of course you use it as a substitute for "conservative," "Republican," or maybe "American."

banned word: liberal    sanctioned word: progressive

"Liberal" has negative connotations.  Those connotations include being a bit naiive about the reality of evil, uncontrolled permissiveness, or the desire to live in a world where all their own bad behaviors will never be frowned upon.  Instead, "progressive" must be used.  If you try to step on a liberal's toes, you're disallowing progress, and that's bad. 

Are you confused yet?  That's the idea when it comes to political-correctness.  Anything absurd goes. 
I'm sure you can add lots of your own words to the list.  Many of you will be tempted to use sanctioned language instead of the banned terms.  Just go ahead and use whatever language you need to express the reality of the situation.  We can't keep burying our heads in the sand, or can we?  -Cal Samuel August
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »